Vaccinating against East Coast fever increases income of pastoralist households
Households directed the increased income resulting from East Coast fever vaccination into childhood education and food purchase.
A study of Kenyan pastoralist households, has found that vaccination against East Coast fever provides significant net income benefits from reduction in livestock mortality, increased milk production, and savings by reducing antibiotic and acaricide treatments. Households spent the additional money on food and education. The researchers found that when fewer cattle died from the disease, girls were more likely to attend secondary school. They report their findings in Science Advances.
“When households vaccinate, it increases their wealth and income and sets them on a trajectory to provide education for their children,” said lead author Tom Marsh, at Washington State University. “Vaccinating is a way for households to pull themselves out of poverty.”
“And it has an intergenerational effect if a family can spend more of their resources on education, especially for girls,” he said.
The study found that vaccinating increased a household’s income because fewer cattle died and disease-free cattle produced more milk to feed the family or to be sold in the marketplace. Households also saved money because vaccinated cattle did not need as many antibiotic treatments or to be sprayed as often for ticks, which spread the disease.
“We are interested in understanding how the health of livestock translates into household decisions and meets sustainable development goals,” said Marsh. “For example, concern about loss of milk production drives the adoption of vaccines because it is so important to households and children.”
Caused Theileria parva, East Coast fever is spread from diseased cattle to healthy cattle through tick bites. The disease can spread quickly and infect cattle throughout the community.
“East Coast fever is one of the most devastating cattle diseases,” said Marsh. “It is the leading cause of calf death in east Africa.”
For pastoral families, cattle are a main source of income. Losing even one to disease can negatively affect an entire family.
Households that vaccinated used fewer antibiotics to treat animals, so the widespread adoption of vaccinations could have larger global health benefits.
“We need to think long term about the use of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance, as well as vaccines,” said Marsh. “If organizations are going to invest more money on vaccines, then besides the known effects – such as fewer cattle deaths – we need to understand the indirect effects.
“Developing better vaccines and easier ways to distribute them could have broad societal effects,” he said.
Read article: Livestock vaccinations translate into increased human capital and school attendance by girls by Thomas L. Marsh, Jonathan Yoder, Tesfaye Deboch, Terry F. McElwain and Guy H. Palmer, published in Science Advances (2016) vol. 2, no. 12, e1601410, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601410